Marcus Ball Contact Site Index
Conflict Resolution ] Child Development ] Psych: General ] Psych: Learning ] Psych: Women ] Psych: Drugs ] Drugs Library ] Psych: Sexuality ] Dr,John Stephens ]
What is Learning? ...

Conflict Resolution
Child Development
Psych: General
Psych: Learning
Psych: Women
Psych: Drugs
Drugs Library
Psych: Sexuality
Dr,John Stephens

What is Learning?
Theories of Learning

More on this topic:

Past Employment

Massage Therapy Clinical Therapist
Telecom Products Sales Executive
ASP Support Client Services
Inquiry Center CRM Specialist
Call Center Design Engineer
Help Desk Desktop Support
Call Center Client Communications Hospitality Reservations Manager
Sales Special Orders
Retail Commercial Ast Manager

Or Read:
Customer Centricity

So what is Learning?

A fairly standard consensual definition is "a relatively permanent change in behavior (sic.; it's American of course) that results from practice." (Atkinson et al 1993). This is of course arguable, particularly the "practice" criterion. We are indeed becoming more confused: evidence from genetics, evolutionary psychology and neuroscience is arguing ever more strongly for predispositions for our behavior. Hume’s tabula rasa is getting dirtier by the minute: this is one of those areas for which Mark Twain’s (attributed) comment might have been coined:

“Many researchers have already cast much darkness upon this subject, and it is probable that if they continue, that we shall soon know nothing at all about it”

Even if psychologists ever agree about what learning is, in practice educationalists won't, because education introduces prescriptive notions about specifying what ought to be learnt, and there is considerable dispute about whether this ought only to be what the teacher wants the learner to learn (implicit in behavioral models), or what the learner wants to learn (as in humanistic models).


What is Taught and what is Learned

It is a simple point that what is taught is not the same as what the students learn, but it does have a number of implications.


In the figure above, it is clear that some of what we teach is wasted effort: but the diagram is a representation of only one learner’s learning. It may be that within a class as a whole, everything we teach is learned, by someone. The shape representing the teaching is smaller than that for learning, because students are also learning from other sources, including colleagues and the sheer experience of being in the educational system, as well as more conventional other resources such as books.  
It is an open question in any given case as to whether what they learn apart from what they are taught is a "good" thing or not. It includes the “hidden curriculum”, which is a phrase used by Snyder (1971) to describe what students learn by default in educational settings. His original observations at MIT in the late 'fifties were about how students with an over-loaded curriculum acquired survival tactics to get through their courses, such as mugging up only the parts which were likely to come up in the exams, and thus losing the point of much of the teaching. This selective learning is one of the characteristics of what is now called "surface learning", although that tends to be seen as an attribute of the learner — Snyder saw it as a problem of the institution. 

From a sociological (Marxist) rather than primarily educational perspective, Bowles and Gintis (1976) suggested that all US schooling has a hidden curriculum dictated by the demands of a capitalist economy. More recently, critical theorists have sought to expose the hidden assumptions behind curricula (see, for example, Collins (1991) — see also Cultural Considerations). Some of the work seems marginal and academically political, but there is no denying that teachers' strategies, such as labeling, can have a profound effect on a student's experience. Claxton (1996) has convincingly argued that adult learning is profoundly influenced by “implicit theories of learning” acquired at school, and that teachers tend to reproduce their implicit models in the ways in which they themselves go on to teach.

Reasons why people learn the "wrong" things, and why they stick:

Authority and learning

Anticipatory-avoidance learning

Learned helplessness

Resistance to learning

Original content updated and hosted at www.learningandteaching.info/learning/

Marcus Ball ] Contact ] Site Index ]